David Wright <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon 18 Apr 2016 at 14:59:14 (+0200), Johan Vromans wrote: >> On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 11:02:30 +0200 >> David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I recommend taking a look at \resetRelativeOctave instead. If you write >> > >> > \resetRelativeOctave a'' >> >> Why is that reset, and not set? You either reset something, or set it to a >> value. \setRelativeOctave a'' makes more sense to me. > > \relative f { g a b c } > > Because the relative octave is already *set* by f, > or by g in the absence of f. Reset means "set again".
I'm ambiguous about that. Either way, this would warrant a shorter name if we start bikeshedding. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
