On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 23:05 Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 19:34 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> >> That's pretty good, actually. Not being able to do native/online >> compilations by anybody wanting to is bad. Yes. Fixes to GUB (possibly >> even just to its information/documentation, maybe it _can_ do it >> already) are of course welcome: > > > David, > > At a brief look over GUB, the really big question in my mind is why on > earth it seems to want to build *everything*. ... >
All this said, it looks like the task of slimming it down for one's own preferred build configurations (in my case, mingw builds, and with a custom lilypond git repo) is simply a case of changing some definitions in the Makefile(s). That probably is not too troublesome for anyone that's confident to start hacking something like Lilypond in the first place... Chris
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
