----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Shann" <rich...@rshann.plus.com>
To: "Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net>
Cc: "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org>; "Lilypond-User Mailing List"
<lilypond-user@gnu.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 8:54 AM
Subject: Re: Question: Cross compilation
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 08:53 +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Shann" <rich...@rshann.plus.com>
To: "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org>
Cc: "Lilypond-User Mailing List" <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: Question: Cross compilation
>
> and, more specifically, I would guess they are spent in creating the
> documentation (as this involves running LilyPond on thousands on
> examples). I say this because Denemo is built overnight for three
> targets with (son of) GUB, and that involves not only building LilyPond
> but also Gtk, Fluidsynth, PortAudio, PortMidi and quite a few other
> packages. (But not the LilyPond documentation, which, out of idleness
> with respect to setting it up, I always access online).
>
> Richard
No - I can build the docs on that machine in 15 minutes. The day-long
compile is building the toolset that Gub uses.
In which case, I guess this is a one-off cost (unless the upstream
sources for the toolset change) on first build of a target architecture?
Richard
Generally, yes. If things are relatively constant, a gub build takes 1-2
hours.
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
