On Thu 03 Nov 2016 at 18:00:59 (-0700), mclaren wrote: > "Wouldn't that rather be (4 + 2/3)/4?" > > Yes, I think you're right. 1/3 is presumably half of the value of a triplet > quarter note, so 1 triplet eighth note. I've corrected that in my second > Lilypond example. My bad. > > Change the "6" denominator in my new Lilypond code to a 3 to get the meter > to display correctly. But the measures do print correctly, so this code > should get what Tobin Chodos wants, I think, 4 quarter notes + 1 triplet > eighth in every measure.
I think Joram pointed that out in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-10/msg00584.html and most/all of this discussion has made that assumption. AFAIK the OP has neither confirmed nor disagreed with this change. Cheers, David. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
