Also, the nice thing about this new design is that it is fully responsive. On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30 Nov 2016 01:00, "Tim McNamara" <tim...@bitstream.net> wrote: > > > > > > > The cosmetic appearance of the web site is most certainly an influential > factor in expanding the "mindshare" of Lilypond. > > Completely agree. > > > Take me- I am a musician. I know nothing useful about C and it's > variants, Scheme, etc. Lilypond might have the most elegant code ever > written > > It doesn't ;-) > > > Unless you only want people who already know how to code to be your > customers. That's a small market. > > "People that are interested in typesetting music" is a small market. The > Venn diagram of those with "people that are confident coders" is **tiny**. > > As others have said, Lilypond has a reasonably steep learning curve. But > when I was learning to use that, I felt Sibelius was also often confusing > and unintuitive. And on that matter, Musescore is far, far worse, despite > doing much of what Lily does in a "wysiwyg" way. > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > -- John Roper Freelance Developer and Simulation Artist Boston, MA USA http://jmroper.com/
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
