The issues are all fixed. This is my proposal. On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:32 PM, John Roper <[email protected]> wrote:
> Also, the nice thing about this new design is that it is fully responsive. > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Chris Yate <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 30 Nov 2016 01:00, "Tim McNamara" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >> >> > The cosmetic appearance of the web site is most certainly an >> influential factor in expanding the "mindshare" of Lilypond. >> >> Completely agree. >> >> > Take me- I am a musician. I know nothing useful about C and it's >> variants, Scheme, etc. Lilypond might have the most elegant code ever >> written >> >> It doesn't ;-) >> >> > Unless you only want people who already know how to code to be your >> customers. That's a small market. >> >> "People that are interested in typesetting music" is a small market. The >> Venn diagram of those with "people that are confident coders" is **tiny**. >> >> As others have said, Lilypond has a reasonably steep learning curve. But >> when I was learning to use that, I felt Sibelius was also often confusing >> and unintuitive. And on that matter, Musescore is far, far worse, despite >> doing much of what Lily does in a "wysiwyg" way. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lilypond-user mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user >> >> > > > -- > John Roper > Freelance Developer and Simulation Artist > Boston, MA USA > http://jmroper.com/ > -- John Roper Freelance Developer and Simulation Artist Boston, MA USA http://jmroper.com/
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
