On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Michael Käppler wrote:
> foo.ily:
> \include "bar.ly"
> bar.ly:
> \include "foo.ily"
> Am I right to consider this a bug?
I don't think so - at least not a bug in Lilypond. It's just doing what
you told it to do, and most other language parsers that have an "include"
facility will similarly be unable to give a useful result when fed
infinitely recursive include files. The usual advice to users is not to
write such input.
--
Matthew Skala
[email protected] People before principles.
http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
