On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Simon Albrecht wrote: > It would be even better, I think, if Lily noticed the circular dependency and > aborted with an informative message instead of just running on forever.
This may be a problem if there's any possibility of an include being conditional. Then, someone could write a non-infinite recursive include deliberately, and be disappointed when Lilypond breaks it. -- Matthew Skala [email protected] People before principles. http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
