Hi, > warning: Adding <> for attaching loose post-event
I would understand it best if the warning said any of: Cannot attach slur to preceding expression Slur is not attached to note or chord Cannot attach slur to note or chord No note or chord before this slur to attach it to (is that English?) No note or chord is preceeding this slur post-event or SlurEvent sounds too technical for me. But I don't know if the above wording would be general enough. Is "note or chord" correct or just one (perhaps most frequent) case? Can a SlurEvent be something else than a slur? Is there a benefit of calling it SlurEvent instead of slur? The new warning is definitely much clearer than the one before. Cheers, Joram _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
