> As far as I can tell the cleanest (and easiest) way would be to > publish the package on CTAN so it will be included in TeX distros like > TeXLive (like it is the case with lilyglyphs).
I'd be really glad to do so, but I don't know how to... And if I remember what I read about the integration of Gregorio, calling external programs from "official" packages obeys quite difficult rules. *Then* of course it > should be mentioned in the LilyPond docs too. It's already mentioned here : http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/luatex I fail to see why it uses different syntax for embedding LilyPond code than lilypond-book does, though. Why not make it compatible by just adding the right \usepackage invocation? The only thing I don't know how to do is to have the same name (lilypond) for thé command and for the environment. So I privileged the environment.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
