Urs Liska <li...@openlilylib.org> writes: > Am 19.11.2017 um 17:55 schrieb Malte Meyn: >>> I would love to see an introduction to that toolchain on >>> lilypondblog.org. Jacques, would you write such a post, please? >> >> That would be nice. > > Communication has already started ;-) > >> And maybe, if or when this has been tested enough by different users >> on different systems, it could become part of the official lilypond >> releases? I’m not sure whether this could be done without manual >> installation of the files in a directory that can be seen by LaTeX … >> But at least a mention in the docs would be nice. > > As far as I can tell the cleanest (and easiest) way would be to > publish the package on CTAN so it will be included in TeX distros like > TeXLive (like it is the case with lilyglyphs). *Then* of course it > should be mentioned in the LilyPond docs too.
I fail to see why it uses different syntax for embedding LilyPond code than lilypond-book does, though. Why not make it compatible by just adding the right \usepackage invocation? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
