Hi David, > One of the differences with the way I do psalms is that I make more of> the > pointing characters into mnemonic "active" characters:> % * for a breath.> % | for a barline.> % ¬ for a double barline.> % _ for a dot.> % † for a (posh) dagger.> % ¶ for a paragraph mark (looks after the spacing for \P).> (Using ¬ (not) for a double barline is because they're printed where's> there's not a break at the half-verse.)> Obviously I have shortcuts like AltGr-P for these characters. (¬ is> on GB keybords.)> > Attached is source with its PDF to give you the idea. The> transposition of the second chant is automatically done by a python> preprocessor that spots the @ in the source. (Sorry I don't have> permission to publish that chant.) The obvious benefit of this is that entering the pointing is clearly a lot less effort than with the approach I'm using though I'm missing the tuplet brackets. The other details w/r to indentation etc. probably could be tackled.
I have yet to convince myself that I want to use LaTeX though. Thanks for sharing, kind regards, Michael -- Michael Gerdau email: [email protected] GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
