Torsten Hämmerle <torsten.haemme...@web.de> writes: > Hi Harm, > > Thanks for the background information, that'd be a valuable improvement. > > > Thomas Morley-2 wrote >> Using your code with the following example: >> >> \markup >> \override #'(box-padding . 0) >> \box >> \override #'(slant-angle . 40) >> \slanted >> \musicglyph #"clefs.G" >> >> results in a not matching boundingbox as well. > > Yes, I know, but this code was meant for text in the first place and it's > quite common for slanted characters to stick out of their bounding boxes to > the left to the right. Unfortunately, there are no slanted bounding boxes > (the are always upright" > But the main reason behind is that > \slanted "one two three" > should give the same result as > \slanted { "one" "two" "three" }
Uh, no? \slanted "one two three" should likely give the same result as \slanted \line { "one" "two" "three" } but \slanted { "one" "two" "three" } is exactly equivalent to { \slanted "one" \slanted "two" \slanted "three" } and is connected with unslanted spaces. > and when separately applying \slanted to "one", "two", and "three", a > widened box would lead to a wider spacing. This _is_ separately applying \slanted to "one", "two", and "three". -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user