It's strange, I tested with a project that had some "rebel ties", commented out the previous fix and used \tieDown, and the ties went in the direction I wanted them to... I'll have to look at it in more detail, but it must surely be my fault, I must have missed something. However in the example above it does work exactly as you mention it does. I think the warnings are ok, they are kind of verbose, but it is telling you "find another way to do this!" so I think the verbosity is useful.
2018-03-15 11:57 GMT-03:00 Jan-Peter Voigt <jp.vo...@gmx.de>: > Hi Stéfano, > > I tested with the force-rebel-tie.ly file you sent earlier in this > thread. What I meant was that \tieDown still does have no effect, when > there is a \voiceOne statement - maybe hidden via << \\ >>. So the first > tie is not changed with the EE-mod in the demo. > Do you think the warnings are too verbose? > > > Am 14.03.2018 um 21:47 schrieb Stefano Troncaro: > > I wanted to let you know that I have tried the refactor-override branch > and the overrides seem to be working fine! I do get a lot of warnings as > you explained, but it does not appear the the EE overrides are getting > overwritten, or maybe I'm misunderstanding your explanation? > > 2018-03-13 13:50 GMT-03:00 Stefano Troncaro <stefanotronc...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi Jan-Peter, >> >> Thank you for your work! I will test the changes later today and let you >> know how it results. >> >> 2018-03-13 7:47 GMT-03:00 Jan-Peter Voigt <jp.vo...@gmx.de>: >> >>> Am 13.03.2018 um 11:37 schrieb David Kastrup: >>> >>>> Jan-Peter Voigt <jp.vo...@gmx.de> writes: >>>> >>>> Hi Stefano, >>>>> >>>>> I have been looking into the issue and created a branch >>>>> 'refactor-override' for the edition-engraver. >>>>> The following is changed in there: >>>>> * Overrides are not applied "by hand" but send as a StreamEvent so >>>>> that once is handled by lily and not the EE >>>>> * Override (and Revert, Set, Unset) sent by the EE are marked so that >>>>> they can be distinguished from other overrides >>>>> >>>>> That means once-overrides are note reverted wrong anymore and the EE >>>>> gives a warning if an overrides supersedes/overwrites an EE mod. This >>>>> is still not completely satisfactory when the EE shall override all >>>>> other settings. But at least it doesn't revert wrong. >>>>> >>>>> If this branch is tested more thoroughly I will merge it into master. >>>>> Now I am looking for a way to let the EE be the last broadcaster so >>>>> that it will not be overridden by overrides sent from the actual music >>>>> stream. >>>>> >>>> >>>> How do you trigger the EE? Overrides from the music stream are sent by >>>> the iterators. That's after start-translation-timestep and before >>>> process-music. >>>> >>> >>> The EE broadcasts overrides (events) inside start-translation-timestep. >>> I tried to do it in process-music, but then they were applied too late. >>> The EE is looking in its internal mod-store if there is something to do >>> for this timestep (for this context). Is there a way to act between those >>> slots - the latest action before process-music? >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> lilypond-user mailing list >>> lilypond-user@gnu.org >>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user >>> >> >> > >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
