On 7/13/2018 2:25 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Ben,

I probably confused you with my wording, sorry! I just meant it's above the 
staff when it's supposed to be (in rare situations where dynamics are 
technically different between the same instrument parts)...and then it's below 
for the part 'extraction' single staff file. ;) Right?
Correct! In the score: dynamics unique to Flute 1 appear above the staff, 
dynamics unique to Flute 2 appear below the staff, and shared dynamics appear 
[once only] below the score; in the parts: dynamics appear below the staff.

Magic.  =)
K.
________________________________

Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: [email protected]


Question please:

Say you have a large orchestral piece, and for the majority of one movement the flutes 1 & 2 share the same music. Suppose they have only about 5-10 measures out of several hundred measures in the movement that are different, requiring separate voices.

I know you can simplify and reduce typing of the music by using variables and such, however I am wondering: how would you go about setting up the instrument for Flutes 1/2, as well as Flute 1 and Flute 2? If you use temporary \\ backslash polyphony in those measures, that won't translate to partcombine of course (because they would 'live' in the same variable, so I can't do \partcombine fluteone and have it work)...The only way to use partcombine then, would be to have two variables correct?

So, how can you *not* re-type or copy-paste the music into the other flute variable for partcombine? I'm looking at this the wrong way I know, perhaps one of you could straighten me out.

I'd like to use partcombine throughout this piece so ideally I'd like to keep the variables separate, but one movement out of the many do not have the need for polyphony so I am unsure how to proceed. But is it sometimes not advisable to use partcombine if the ratio of polyphony is low? I'm wondering what the common consensus is of when to use partcombine vs. when to manually single-variable input everything << >> inline.

Thank you!


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to