On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 at 11:56, Thomas Morley <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am Fr., 4. Jan. 2019 um 11:17 Uhr schrieb Gianmaria Lari > <[email protected]>: > > > > My apologies, I didn't specify the fact that it is 3/4 time. > > > > Thomas solution is graphically perfect.... > > Well, my suggestion meets the image. Actually, the composers notation > is simply wrong, strictly speaking. > I've seen it many times, though. > Yes it's wrong but I think it is used because it better complies with the need to be easy to write it and to be less "dense" (and then someway easier to read) than traditional/correct way. Maybe the composer could add a small footnote but in my (not expert) opinion it is a very good solution. For example I found ugly and "difficult" to read the bass part of the BWV846 (c major prelude). > > > but I have to manage the midi output "manually ". > > I don't care much about midi, why do you do? It's never music. > For didactical reason. And for that, it is pretty important. [...]For the record, one could do: > > \layout { \context { \Voice \remove Slur_engraver } } > > \new Staff \with { \consists Slur_engraver } > { > \key aes \major > \clef bass > \time 3/4 > << > aes,2.\=7( \\ { s4 ees2 } \\ s2. \\ { s2 bes4\=7) } > >> > } > > This has serious drawbacks, you'll not happy using it... > What's the equal sign? never saw before. What's about this? \version "2.19.82" \score { { \time 3/4 \clef bass \key aes \major << {\hideNotes aes,2.} \\ {\hideNotes s4 ees2} \\ {\hideNotes s2 bes4} \\ {aes,2.*1/3( ees2*1/2 bes4) }>> } \layout {} \midi {} } I know I could use tag but I tend to avoid them if possible.... Ciao and thank you, g.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
