Hi List,
Please consider these two staves:
%%%
\version "2.19.83"
\layout {
indent = 0
ragged-right = ##f
}
\fixed c' \scaleDurations 2/3 {
\key c\minor
\time 2/4
\omit Staff.TimeSignature
\omit Score.BarNumber
\repeat percent 2 { bes,!16 g f' c' es' g }
\repeat percent 2 {
a,
-\tweak extra-offset #'(-1.9 . 4.3)
_\markup\with-color #red {
\with-dimensions-from \null
\override #'(on . 0.3)\override #'(off . 0.1)\override #'(thickness .
2)
\concat {
\draw-dashed-line #'(0 . -5)
\hspace #.7
\draw-dashed-line #'(0 . -5)
}
}
fis es' c' d' fis }
\repeat percent 2 {
aes,!
-\tweak extra-offset #'(-2.05 . 3.5)
_\markup\with-color #red {
\with-dimensions-from \null
\override #'(on . 0.3)\override #'(off . 0.1)\override #'(thickness .
2)
\concat {
\draw-dashed-line #'(0 . -5)
\hspace #.7
\draw-dashed-line #'(0 . -5)
}
}
fis es' c' d' fis
}
\repeat percent 2 { g, c bes es as c }
}
\fixed c' \scaleDurations 2/3 {
\key c\minor
\time 2/4
\omit Staff.TimeSignature
\omit Score.BarNumber
\repeat percent 2 { g,16 b, as d g b, }
\repeat percent 2 { f, d d' g b d }
%% expected spacing?:
%\once\override Staff.BarLine.extra-spacing-width = #'(0 . 1.2)
e,
-\tweak extra-offset #'(-1.25 . 5.8)
_\markup\with-color #red {
\with-dimensions-from \null
\override #'(on . 0.3)\override #'(off . 0.1)\override #'(thickness . 2)
\concat {
\draw-dashed-line #'(0 . -6)
\hspace #.05
\draw-dashed-line #'(0 . -6)
}
}
g g' bes? des' g e, bes as' des' g' bes
}
%%%
I find the last measure natural sign on Staff #2 optically misplaced (see
line #52 what I was expecting for).
1) Is it a -- known? -- bug?
2) If not, would you consider this alignment as traditionally correct?
TIA, cheers,
Pierre
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
