Ok, here's a -- simple -- snippet (I should have start with it, sorry):
%%
\version "2.19.83"
{ s1 cis'4 }
{ s1 ais4 }
{ s1 fis4 }
{ s1 ais''4 }
{ s1 cis'''4 }
{ s1 eis'''4 }
%%
So it seems that the LP alignment changes after more than two ledger lines
(probably because of the accidentals vertical-skylines limit).
Again: does that follow the traditional -- state-of-the-art -- rules?
Cheers,
Pierre
Le ven. 4 oct. 2019 à 08:58, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
[email protected]> a écrit :
> Hi David,
> Thanks for your answer.
> However, I probably badly explained my problem since it has nothing to do
> with any modern style alignment.
> Thing is that -- *in situ* -- every measure that begins with an
> accidental sign offsets the first note, except for this particular measure.
> Why? There is much room for that offset...
> (See measure 15 *in situ*)
>
>
> Le jeu. 3 oct. 2019 à 16:56, David Wright <[email protected]> a
> écrit :
>
>> On Thu 03 Oct 2019 at 14:15:56 (+0200), Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
>> > Please consider these two staves:
>> > %%%
>> [ … 26ll snipped … ]
>> > fis es' c' d' fis }
>> > \repeat percent 2 {
>> > aes,!
>> > -\tweak extra-offset #'(-2.05 . 3.5)
>> > _\markup\with-color #red {
>> > \with-dimensions-from \null
>> > \override #'(on . 0.3)\override #'(off . 0.1)\override
>> #'(thickness .
>> > 2)
>> > \concat {
>> > \draw-dashed-line #'(0 . -5)
>> > \hspace #.7
>> > \draw-dashed-line #'(0 . -5)
>> > }
>> > }
>> > fis es' c' d' fis
>> [ … ]
>>
>> > I find the last measure natural sign on Staff #2 optically misplaced
>> (see
>> > line #52 what I was expecting for).
>> > 1) Is it a -- known? -- bug?
>> > 2) If not, would you consider this alignment as traditionally correct?
>>
>> I progressively lowered your aes,! above to ges,! and then f,! at
>> which point the natural moved to the left, just like the measure below
>> it in the second stave. Isn't this merely because the top of the
>> natural sign is now clear of the bottom of the barline, so there's
>> room to print it further left.
>>
>> (As an aside, it amuses me to read the posts from people who want their
>> scores' x-axes treated precisely like graph paper, with strict
>> proportional spacing. Surely this means that the first note of each
>> measure should overprint the barline.)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David.
>>
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
