Le sam. 23 mai 2020 à 22:46, antlists <antli...@youngman.org.uk> a écrit : > > On 22/05/2020 13:26, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > IIUC, CC licences aim to protect against others making money from > > your work. How is "ASCAP not being happy" related to that? > > > > > Unless I'm mistaken, LilyPond (GNU) and CC belong to the "eco-system" > > where sharing is the norm (to enhance the common cultural pool) while > > making it hard for "free-riders". Using the tools offered by that alternate > > system, and then bow to the arguments of those who smear it seems a > > contradiction. > > > You're correct that GNU and CC belong to the eco-system where sharing is > the norm, but NEITHER have any objection to others making making money > (yes they do both object to free-riders).
And they do object to being misrepresented, wherein lays the contradiction I was pointing out, not about "making money" (which I evoked similarly to what you did, as quoted below). Regards, Gilles > CC has an *optional* clause that forbids commercial activity (I use it > on my photos), and GNU forbids charging for THE SOFTWARE. But CC doesn't > forbid commercial activity by default, and GNU permits charging for > services, such as supplying the software, supporting the software, and > anything like that. > > Cheers, > Wol >