On 5/24/20, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > You are working from the premise that everybody except you is an idiot.
Guys, stop bickering and veering off-topic. The original purpose of this thread was to help Francesco gain some insight into the copyright modalities and possible publishing choices; arguing about whether one particular license authorizes or not to sell software and/or CDs and/or services may be interesting (though I believe this has already been discussed ad nauseam elsewhere, and by more knowledgeable people than *any* of us) but it remains absolutely orthogonal to the matter at hand. Granted, I was probably the one who opened that can of worms in the first place; although I do have my own principles and beliefs, the only point I’ve been trying to get across is that Francesco has _several_ options (and not that many risks), rather than the Single Mandatory Way that’s ordinarily offered to authors and artists. As far as I’m concerned, there is no invalid or morally corrupt choice (even publishing under all-rights-reserved and subjugating oneself to some private copyright organization), as long as it _is_ a choice, made deliberately and not out of ignorance or fear. Cheers, -- V.
