Am Do., 25. Juni 2020 um 10:55 Uhr schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider <[email protected]>: > > Hi Harm, > > Le mer. 24 juin 2020 à 23:26, Thomas Morley <[email protected]> a > écrit : >> >> To the author of said snippet. >> lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=1110 >> >> I will not approve it in it's current state. > > > Ok. > >> This sounds like default LilyPond being wrong in this regard. If so, >> it's a bug, needed to be reported, probably discussed and finally >> fixed. > > > Ok, will do. > >> >> Tbh, I don't think LilyPond is wrong. Ofcourse I'd could be proven wrong. > > > See: E. Gould/ Behind bars (ed. 2011, pp. 234-235) > (and: > http://lilypond-french-users.1298960.n2.nabble.com/Clef-apres-signe-de-reprise-td7589673.html) > > Cheers, > Pierre
Hi Pierre, ok, I'm convinced. Please change the description to something at the lines of: "According to Elaine Gould, Behind Bars, pp ..., changes of ... should be printed after the closing repeat-sign. This is currently not the default in Lily. This snippet provides a manual workaround." Syntax, wording, grammar could surely be improved... Nevertheless, I don't think it should be doc-tagged. If it's an issue then an entry in "known issues and warnings" seems to be more appropriate, imho. And thanks for the bug-report, cheers, Harm
