Hi Harm, Thank you for your suggestion. Definitly better. Ultimately, I've created a new snippet: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=1116 If you're ok with it, I'll delete snippet #1110 Cheers, Pierre
Le jeu. 25 juin 2020 à 22:21, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Am Do., 25. Juni 2020 um 10:55 Uhr schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider > <pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>: > > > > Hi Harm, > > > > Le mer. 24 juin 2020 à 23:26, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> > a écrit : > >> > >> To the author of said snippet. > >> lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=1110 > >> > >> I will not approve it in it's current state. > > > > > > Ok. > > > >> This sounds like default LilyPond being wrong in this regard. If so, > >> it's a bug, needed to be reported, probably discussed and finally > >> fixed. > > > > > > Ok, will do. > > > >> > >> Tbh, I don't think LilyPond is wrong. Ofcourse I'd could be proven > wrong. > > > > > > See: E. Gould/ Behind bars (ed. 2011, pp. 234-235) > > (and: > http://lilypond-french-users.1298960.n2.nabble.com/Clef-apres-signe-de-reprise-td7589673.html > ) > > > > Cheers, > > Pierre > > Hi Pierre, > > ok, I'm convinced. > Please change the description to something at the lines of: > "According to Elaine Gould, Behind Bars, pp ..., changes of ... > should be printed after the closing repeat-sign. > This is currently not the default in Lily. > This snippet provides a manual workaround." > > Syntax, wording, grammar could surely be improved... > > Nevertheless, I don't think it should be doc-tagged. > If it's an issue then an entry in "known issues and warnings" seems to > be more appropriate, imho. > > And thanks for the bug-report, cheers, > Harm >
