Hi Martín, > how do you think that this feature is more useful than \tweaking the y-offset?
I don't, personally. =) > If the documentation explains how to move a rest, the officially recommended > way should be using \tweak in my opinion. I agree. I was simply offering a less… um… nuclear doc-revision option. > It's unclear to me what's the use case of the option of adding a note to a > \rest (which in itself sounds like a contradiction). Much like a few other “seems like a great idea when you're a newbie” (which I will refrain from explicitly mentioning here), I believe the main use case is to make it really easy for new users to fix collisions or “hard-code” the rest position, without introducing them to \override-ing and \tweak-ing. > If we follow the WSIWYM paradigm, you can't possibly mean to put a > "note-rest" somewhere. Perhaps not pointing that out or removing the feature > altogether is better in the long run? I agree. Cheers, Kieren
