Hi Mats, > What I miss in the discussion here is the user interface aspect and the ease > of use. At least for a less experienced LilyPond user, the c''8\rest has a > very intuitive meaning of "a rest placed where you would place the c''", > whereas \tweak as a general concept requires much more higher level of > LilyPond competence and even if you do pattern matching, you have to figure > out what the argument 1 means, what the unit is and if positive or negative > values are up or down.
That's exactly what I was referring to in my email response to Martín. =) > I'm not entirely positive to the proposal. That's exactly why I didn't suggest replacing the existing documentation, but rather augmenting it. =) Cheers, Kieren.
