Hello Jean,
actually, I /did/ subscribe. I wonder why my subscription was
unsuccessful. I just tried again.
I finally found the cause of this error: It seems I checked only the
paper variables of my main document and Wetterlied.ly, whereas I didn’t
llok carefully into the other tqo source files. Both of them had
system-count set to something too small for Wetterlied.ly. Since I did
not set a new system-count for the latter, the systems got crammed.
Regards,
Immanuel
Am 30.01.2023 um 17:33 schrieb Jean Abou Samra:
Hello Immanuel,
Welcome to this list. For your information, I had to approve your
message manually as a list administrator because you are not
subscribed to the list yet. Please fix this by subscribing on
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user (note that once
subscribed, you can opt out of receiving emails or choose to receive
only one batch digest per day).
Le 30 janv. 2023 à 17:20, Immanuel Asmus <[email protected]> a écrit :
Dear community,
I’ve been using lilypond for a fair amount of time, and even though I
sometimes use non-standard notation, I’ve never had any problem
finding a solution. Until now.
It’s my first time typesetting a song cycle I wrote. I want (as what
I understand is recommended) to typeset every piece on its own, then
include all of them via the \include command.
My main document looks like this:
\version "2.22.2"
\header {
title = "Seltsame Liebeslieder"
composer = "Frühjahr 2007 – Frühjahr 2021"
tagline = ##f
}
\include "Trinklied.ly"
\include "Fruehlingslied.ly"
\include "Wetterlied.ly"
Now, including the first and second piece was no problem. When I add
the third piece, however, I end up without any line break up from the
middle of it (see attached “nobreak.png”).
When the music overflows like this, it almost certainly means that a
duration is off somewhere, and the last note of each measure is
actually straddling over the bar line, continuing into the next
measure by a tiny amount. I would try to insert some bar checks (the
“|” sign) at places where bar lines are supposed to be, to flag rhythm
problems. If you get different results when you include your score
after another score, it might mean that you started the problematic
score without an explicit duration on the first note. In that case,
the duration is that of the previous note, or “4” if there is no
previous note. This is a possible cause, maybe you just need to add a
“4” on the first note of the score that overflows.
Best,
Jean
