I’ve just looked at the images and especially w/r to the Alto clef I strongly prefer the new spacing. For the others there are spots where I’m not sure it is too tight but overall the new spacing appears to be more balanced.
I thus think the new spacing is better overall. Kind regards Michael Mobil gesendet > Am 09.12.2023 um 08:12 schrieb Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org>: > > >>> please have a look at Merge Request 2188 and comment there on how >>> to proceed with the new distances between clefs and time >>> signatures, together with the new distances between clefs and key >>> signatures. >>> >>> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/2188 >>> >>> The question is whether the new distances should be based on the >>> widest standard clef glyph (which is the alto clef, and which is >>> done currently in the MR), or whether they should be based on the >>> most common one, the treble clef. >> >> For better comparison, I've updated/added the screenshots in the MR >> so that you can do a blink-comparison of the images. > > A few people responded, and the opinions are exactly 50:50. It would > be great if more people could chime in! > > > Werner >
