Would it be possible to overlap the flat and the tie? Like in the attached
picture.
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 17:23, Knute Snortum <ksnor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 7:56 AM Yoshiaki Onishi <i...@yoshionishi.com>
> wrote:
>
>> > Here the ties are perfectly aligned:
>> >
>> > (See attachment s1)
>> > \version "2.25.23"
>> > \fixed c'
>> > {
>> > <e g>2^~
>> > <e g c>
>> > }
>> >
>> > But when I change the last chord from...
>> >
>> > <e g c>
>> > to
>> > <e g ces>
>> >
>> > ... the resulting tie between g appears small and not clear (to me).
>> (See attachment s2)
>> >
>> > What's the best way to fix it?
>> > Thanks, g.
>>
>>
>> It might not be the best solution, but I treated the tie in question as a
>> slur, as per:
>> https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/notation/modifying-ties-and-slurs
>>
>> Then I put the slur and tie marks within the chord, as doing so is
>> possible (I did this out of caution, and in order to make the \tweak work.
>>
>> So here's my solution:
>>
>> %%%%%%%%%
>> \version "2.25.23"
>> \fixed c'
>> {
>> <e
>> \tweak Slur.control-points #'((1.75 . -1.85)(2.5 . -1.25)(3.5 .
>> -1.25)(4 . -1.85))
>> ^(
>> g~>2
>>
>> <e) g ces>
>> }
>> %%%%%%%%%
>>
>> Maybe there could be another (easier?) solution, but this did the trick
>> for the time being.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Yoshi
>>
>
> You could use the minimum tie length like this:
>
> %%%
> \fixed c'
> {
> \once \override Tie.minimum-length = 5
> <e g>2^~
> <e g ces>
> }
> %%%
>
> --
> Knute Snortum
>
>
