I didn't try your version Yoshiaki because it was a bit too much complex.
Thank you anyway for your help, I saved it for future reference (you never
know:)).
Regarding the last version with \shape: thank you Knute, it works well for
me except that as you said is a solution "case-by-case" and not very clean.
To simplify the code, isn't there a way to disregard the presence of the
flat, so that LilyPond prints the tie as if the flat weren't there?
Thanks!!!!
Gianmaria
On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 at 00:29, Yoshiaki Onishi <i...@yoshionishi.com> wrote:
> ... I tried to use \shape #'(alist) Tie option when I was crafting my
> solution, but I suppose I wasn't patient enough here. Good to know that
> \shape indeed works. To be fair, mine does allow the overlapping of the
> tie/slur over accidentals, but my solution isn't elegant.
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 5:55 PM Knute Snortum <ksnor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 10:37 AM Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Would it be possible to overlap the flat and the tie? Like in the
>>> attached picture.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, but it would have to be case-by-case with a \shape command (at least
>> I don't know of another way.)
>>
>> %%%
>> \version "2.24.4"
>>
>> \fixed c'
>> {
>> \once \override Tie.minimum-length = 5
>> \shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (1 . 0) (1 . 0)) Tie
>> <e g>2^~
>> <e g ces>
>> }
>> %%%
>>
>>
>> --
>> Knute Snortum
>>
>>
