On Sun, Nov 9, 2025 at 5:44 AM Yoshiaki Onishi <[email protected]> wrote:
> In writing this, I realize I am not addressing the very issue you
> describe, but it does appear it isn’t necessary for you to change
> \acciaccatura to a \slashedGrace to modify the slur shape. As an exercise
> for myself, I just did a quick example (sorry, it’s not MWE) out of Chopin
> Prelude No. 12, m. 24 (I based it on the Paderewski urtext edition). Code
> is at the end of my message. As you will see, it is still possible to
> adjust the slur shape within acciaccatura, but it appears the placement of
> the \shape command matters.
>
Here is the code stripped down to what I think are the essentials:
%%%
\version "2.25.30"
slurShapeTwo = \shape #'((0 . 0.25)(-0.2 . 1)(-0.25 . 1)(-0.5 . 1.5)) Slur
% slurShapeTwo = \shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0)) Slur
{
\acciaccatura { \slurShapeTwo f'8 }
\stemDown <e' c'>[ <d' b>]
}
%%%
It looks like you're using \slurShapeTwo to get the acciaccatura to attach
to the top note. If you uncomment the second slurShapeTwo you will see
that it attaches to the slur of the bottom note. My use of \slashedGrace
and a manual slur was just to get the slur closer to what I wanted, then
the \shape command doesn't have to be as drastic.
--
Knute Snortum
