Trevor -
Interesting thread. Lily seems to be transitioning from development to
productization with bug reports drifting from "it doesn't work" to "maybe
foo would be better." Congraduations (sic).
Thanks.
- Bruce
-----Original Message-----
From: Trevor Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 5:57 PM
To: Fairchild
Cc: Han-Wen Nienhuys; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[email protected]; Nicolas Sceaux
Subject: Re: Music function arguments
On 1/14/06, Fairchild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please explain. Maybe post the beginning of the thread, which seems
> to be missing from the archives - or has a different subject line.
>
> Thanks.
>
> - Bruce
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Trevor Baca
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 4:49 PM
> To: Han-Wen Nienhuys
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]; Nicolas
> Sceaux
> Subject: Re: Music function arguments
>
>
> On 12/14/05, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Trevor Bača wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > I agree, if for no other reason than to reduce the number of flips
> > > over to the manual while inputting.
> > >
> > > Of course, it probably would be better for *everything* to be
> > >
> > > \command "arg"
> > >
> > > removing the kinda alien-looking (if you're not a scheme
> > > programmer)
> >
> > ACtually, this turned out to be trivial to do. I'm not sure why I
> > didn't do it earlier.
>
> Well hallelujah. This part of the peanut gallery says go for it before
> the userbase gets any bigger (resulting in more backwards
> compatability complaints).
Hi Bruce,
Check for a thread originally entitled "Invisible notes, Scheme contexts"
starting on 12 December 2005. Don Blaheta authored the first post, and the
thread runs through a large number of topics.
Trevor.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
