Hello,

I can write \consists Span_arpeggio_engraver or \consists
"Span_arpeggio_engraver"; LilyPond doesn't seem to mind either way.

Is there a reason why engravers are enclosed in inverted commas in the
documentation, when it makes no difference to compilation if they are
removed?

Regards,
Neil


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to