On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:02:43 +0000 "Neil Puttock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can write \consists Span_arpeggio_engraver or \consists > "Span_arpeggio_engraver"; LilyPond doesn't seem to mind either way. > > Is there a reason why engravers are enclosed in inverted commas in the > documentation, when it makes no difference to compilation if they are > removed? I think it's just to make them easier to see. ly/engraver-init.ly uses double-quotes around all engravers, too. I've added this to our doc-writing policy. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
