Hi Neil
Perhaps "both" is an option? What I mean is, use a markup in a score
context where this is appropriate to the example or where the markup can be
used to modify the appearance of music, but as bare text otherwise.
Examples of the former might include \dynamic, \fret-diagram, \postscript,
\score, \stencil. There are probably many more. Examples of modifying
straight text don't really need a little score underneath, and too many of
these would spoil the layout and make it harder to browse the list.
Trevor D
----- Original Message -----
From: "Neil Puttock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lilypond-User" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 9:55 PM
Subject: GDP: Opinions sought on markup command snippets
Hi everybody,
I'm just about to start work on creating snippets for each of the
\markup commands listed in appendix B.6. Before I begin, I'd like to
canvass opinion on how they should be demonstrated.
As I see it, there are two options:
1. Continue in the same vein as the two existing examples (\raise and
\super), where each command is part of a markup in a score;
2. Show each command in isolation, i.e., within a bald \markup block,
displaying text marks only.
Naturally, the latter option would be much quicker to implement, but
is a more artificial way of demonstrating text markup since most users
will be incorporating text into scores. It is also likely to look less
pleasing than minimal score snippets, since they would serve as a
regular break between the commands.
I welcome your thoughts as to the best way forward.
Regards,
Neil
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
