On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 21:54:19 +0200
"Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/4/3, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > As you all know, I'm not at all fond of duplication in the docs,
> > but I'm having difficulty arguing that "String music" would be
> > easier to understand if we omitted discussion of bowings. And
> > artificial harmonics, for that matter -- those are covered in
> > Pitches.
>
> I wasn't proposing to duplicate any information, but just to use @refs
> everywhere we can to make finding the needed information easier.
>
> Trevor: my point was just to link to NR 1.3.2.3:
> "Breathing marks can be obtained using the syntax described in
> "Breathing marks".
>
> Admittedly, this is silly, but still, we're talking to
> wind-instrument-players -- we have to take that into account :)
And bowing, for string players?
"Bowing may be added to scores like other articulations; for more
information, see @ref{articulations and ornamentations}. The
exact names of bowings are described in @ref{List of articulations}."
?
Once a reader figures out the above, he'll be wondering why we
didn't they just write
c2\upbow
c2\downbow
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
