2008/4/3, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> And bowing, for string players?
>
> "Bowing may be added to scores like other articulations; for more
> information, see @ref{articulations and ornamentations}. The
> exact names of bowings are described in @ref{List of articulations}."
> ?
>
> Once a reader figures out the above, he'll be wondering why we
> didn't they just write
> c2\upbow
> c2\downbow
?
Seems consistent to me... Do you mean you don't like this sentence?
Was it meant to be a joke? If so, I don't find it more ridiculous than
the other documentation-style sentences you make me write :)
Cheers,
Valentin
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
