Apart from what Francisco notes below I don't see anything wrong with
it. It's really good and I can't believe I didn't know about chord mode
before. I'm constantly amazed at the things Lilypond can do! Thanks guys,
Jon
Francisco Vila wrote:
2008/7/28 Carl D. Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Dear LilyPond Users,
Notation Reference Section 2.7 Chord notation of the GDP has now been
released for public comment. The HTML version of the document is available
at
<http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/Chord-notation.h
tml#Chord-notation>.
I surely do not understand well:
"Only the first inversion can be created by adding a bass note. The
second inversion requires changing the root of the chord. "
The example shows the Second inversion of
c'1:
coded as
c':/g
and then the first inversion coded as
e:6-3-^5
and
e:m6-^5
Therefore, it is the first inversion what requires changing the root,
whilst the second inversion CAN be created by adding a bass note. See
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/music-glossary/inversion.html
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user