Thanks :) The lilypond export, although in beta, is a lot more solid than the import, consider it alpha. Lilypond syntax is very versatile, making it a powerful tool. But it's hard to parse as well.
David Stocker wrote: > > While MuseScore's ability to import *.ly files is a nice feature, the > greatest thing about its export of *.ly files is the ability to type a > score with keyboard and mouse, and then use LilyPond as the typesetter > on the exported *.ly file. > > MuseScore is still in beta status. Although its feature set doesn't yet > rival Finale and Sibelius, a thorough walk through the menus and dialogs > reveals that the groundwork has been laid to make it every bit as > feature rich, and more. It's quite a bit buggier than even Finale (which > is saying something), but then again, it's still in beta status. > > Their goal--to become the de-facto standard notation program for > learning institutions--is ambitious to be sure. It's not clear at this > point if it will ever mature into a professional grade engraving tool. > Nevertheless, I'm watching with interest... > > David > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Notation-Editor-with-MIDI-tp23940840p23984943.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
