On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:43 AM, Graham Percival <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:41:28PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Patrick Horgan<[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On this page > > > > http://percival-music.ca/blogfiles/out/lilypond-general_6.html#Crash-course > > > it mentions that help is wanted because an example is too wide for > narrow > > > media. What's the criteria? It fits in 800x600 just fine and these > day > > > web-developers say that 1024x768 is the new 800x600. Much of the site > > > certainly doesn't work for hand held devices. > > > > Ah, I made a last-minute change to the width of div#main and forgot to > > remove this comment. > > Well, that particular lilypond output is the only one that's that > wide. I think it could be made 600-pixels wide rather than 800, > without harming the typography. > > Anybody up for typesetting it and generating a new png? > > I didn't re-typeset it but used the netpbm tools to bring it down to 600. Does it still look o.k. or should I do it from source code? Jon -- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com
<<attachment: example-score-600.png>>
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
