On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Jonathan Kulp <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:43 AM, Graham Percival <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> >> Well, that particular lilypond output is the only one that's that >> wide. I think it could be made 600-pixels wide rather than 800, >> without harming the typography. >> >> Anybody up for typesetting it and generating a new png? >> >> I didn't re-typeset it but used the netpbm tools to bring it down to 600. > Does it still look o.k. or should I do it from source code? > > Jon > > Here's one done from source code instead of resizing. It's 599 pixels wide. I think it stands up better to zooming than the other png did. Jon -- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com
<<attachment: example-score.png>>
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
