Reinhold Kainhofer <reinh...@kainhofer.com> writes: > Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2009 08:35:24 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Jay Anderson <horndud...@gmail.com> writes: >> > Also for the other responses, sorry if I didn't explain it very well. >> > This is the only way I've seen triple (and quadruple) stops notated so >> > I thought it would be self-explanatory. >> >> Again: could you explain why you want to write 2. as a duration and then >> remove the dot manually? >> >> This does not really make sense at all. > > He does not want to write 2. as a duration. He wants to write the > whole thing as one chord (It IS displayed and played as one chord), > where one note has a 4 duration, and the others have a > 2. duration.
Ah ok, he is removing the dot from the quarter note. Hm. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
