Le Sat, 2 Jan 2010 00:32:08 -0500, Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> a écrit :
> Hi Michael, > > > I am experimenting with methods to enter notes from a manuscript > > and produce several typeset scores, including at least • one that > > looks very much like the manuscript, for proof reading • another > > that is good for performance. There will probably be other versions > > too. > > > > Problem: the manuscript naturally has errors that need to be > > corrected for a performance score, to say nothing of editorial > > changes that may do more than correct errors. But I would like to > > make the production of performance scores independent of the > > representation of the manuscript. Data entry from the manuscript > > should not involve any musical correction; editing changes for a > > performance score should not involve any change to the > > representation of the manuscript (which has a lot of historical > > significance, as well as being the source of the music). > > Corrections to note durations are particularly troublesome. > > > > I can build scripts to edit a *.ly file, say with sed, but I'd > > rather stick entirely to Lilypond and its tools. Any pointers? > > Look into \tag. Which is documented there: Notation Reference (NR) 3.2.2 "Different editions from one source" http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Different-editions-from-one-source ;-) Cheers, Xavier -- Xavier Scheuer <x.sche...@gmail.com>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user