Well, I'm completly amazed by scheme function, which I'm totally
unable to build. What I'd have done instead is :
\score {
\new Score <<
\new Staff <<
s4-\markup{LilyPond default, rests in both voices.}
\relative c'' { c4 d e r | r2 e4 g | R1 } \\
\relative c'' { c4 b a r | r a g2 | R1 }
>>
\new Staff <<
s4-\markup{Merge rests as per standard notation practice.}
\relative c'' { c4 d e _*b\rest*_ | r2 e4 g | R1 } \\ %*2 b\rest
will merge at the same place...*
\relative c'' { c4 b a _*b\rest*_ | r a g2 | R1 }
>>
>>
\layout {}
}
which lead to merged rests... but it is a very secular way to do it !
Regards
JMarc
On 13/09/2010 10:45, bart deruyter wrote:
Hi,
I have found a way to merge rests when there are two voices on one
stave, but which evolve as one voice, to limit clutter on the score on
this page : http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336 .
It is very usefull indeed, but isn't there a more general way to merge
rests. It's a lot of code for a task, that I think is often needed.
This code is limited to two voices, but I already have a score laying
around here with three voices. I know about hiding rests, but then
I'll have to change the position of the remaining rests to the center
of the staff, like the example of the snippet shows. I'm quite a
beginner, so I think that's pretty advanced stuff already.
Any ideas for an alternative to the snippet?
Greetz,
Bart
http://www.bartart3d.be/
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
