On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:21 AM, James Wilkinson wrote:
> On 10/11/10 6:22 PM, James Bailey wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 11, 2010, at 11:22 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 04:32:48PM -0400, James Wilkinson wrote:
>>>> On 9/23/10 6:00 PM, Vicente Solsona wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> if the dynamics are the same, it's better to write them just once. thus
>>>>> you:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) save typing
>>>>> 2) help lilypond so it does't need to waste time guessing obvious things
>>>>> and it can concentrate on the big stuff :)
>>>>>
>>>>> you just need to create a third voice with spacers and all the common
>>>>> marks, in parallel with the other two:
>>>
>>> I'm not at all certain that's a good idea. The dynamics won't be
>>> present in MIDI (which is probably no great loss), but more
>>> importantly, it messes up the semantics for no particularly good
>>> reason.
>>
>> Maybe I misunderstand, but if I do:
>> {
>> <<
>> \relative c' { c4 d e f<< { g a g f } \\ { e2 d }>> e4 f e d c1 }
>> {s1\mf s4\< s\! s\> s\! s1\p s }
>> >>
>> }
>>
>> The dynamics show up in the MIDI. And if they're separated into variables, I
>> can change the dynamics and the music independantly and easily, without fuss
>> or muss.
>
> I ran this and got the dynamics on a separate staff with no notes. I don't
> think that's what you meant.
Sorry, I forgot the \new Staff before the <<>>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
