To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 9:33 AM Subject: Re: Odd output
Phil Holmes <mail <at> philholmes.net> writes:From: "Marco Correia" <marco.v.correia <at> gmail.com> > > \include "english.ly" > { > \clef treble > \time 4/4 > << > { fs'4 } > \\ > { f'4 } >> >>> This was one of the first issues I raised, in June this year. I think it was my first bug report: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1134Lilypond's _only_ failure here is missing that the both notes needaccidentals, because she compares only with previous notes, not simultaneous notes. (She does compare all voices.) If we force an explicit accidental with'!' << { fis'4 } \\ {f'!4} >> then Lilypond prints both a sharp and a natural -- with the natural always closer to the notehead so it is distinct from an extra natural that just cancels an earlier accidental. Marco, and Phil, is sharp-natural-notehead the desired notation for thissituation? (I prefer it to the double-stem method, which I have seen only in Gardner Read's textbook, the "Displaying complex chords" snippet, and nowhereelse.)
The version that Chappell uses in the Mikado is attached. -- Phil Holmes
<<attachment: Mikado.png>>
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
