Janek Warchoł <[email protected]> writes:

> 2011/8/24 Graham Percival <[email protected]>:
>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 07:40:50PM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
>>>    Very nicely done, indeed, Urs!  Thanks for putting this together.  
>>> Graham,
>>>    would this be something to be linked from LM?
>>
>> The normal thing to would be to add a link to the wiki.
>
> Which is down at the moment, if i'm not mistaken?
> Frankly, i think that it would be too hidden on the wiki (i have an
> impression that our wiki is not very alive).
> Maybe we should create a "links" section on the website.

I'd like to point to
<URL:http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/maintain.html#Ethical-and-Philosophical-Consideration>
from the guidelines for maintainers of GNU projects.

    A GNU package should not refer the user to any non-free
    documentation for free software. The need for free documentation to
    come with free software is now a major focus of the GNU project; to
    show that we are serious about the need for free documentation, we
    must not contradict our position by recommending use of
    documentation that isn’t free.

I would be disappointed if we considered a situation where material that
is of essential help to Lilypond users (to the degree where it would
make good sense to reference it) is not freely available and
redistributable satisfying enough that we gave encouragement and support
to it on our web site.

-- 
David Kastrup


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to