Urs Liska <[email protected]> writes: > OTOH I don't think there is any problem with the mere existence of > non-free documentation.
Correct. The actual problem is the non-existence of free documentation, and creating references to non-free documentation is a disincentive to changing that. I am glad that you see this similarly, since "rebasing" your work on free material might be less work than rewriting it from scratch. > And one of my intentions was to provide online material that probably > will be exposed to search engines and opens an additional path to find > LilyPond resources. Note that this direction is of course open to you already. I would just be unhappy about having Lilypond sites point back to non-free material. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
