On 29 mai 2012, at 09:56, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > Just to make sure you have seen > > > http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/b-sendorfer-sponsors-open-goldberg-project-providing-concert-grand-ceus-recording-technology-0 > > Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically superior choice for this > sponsoring project? What are we missing? > > Jan >
We're missing consensus. I think that if there were a SponsorshipMeister, not unlike the BugMeister, we could do really cool stuff like this. Besides the monetary aid, this brings huge recognition to the community and gets a lot of people on board. LoMuS is already a great step in this direction - it took me 1 hour max to fill out and send the application and as a result we'll have better skylines at the end of the summer. We already have a great piece of software that speaks for itself - we just need someone (or a group of people) dedicated to contacting people and seeking out collaborations. But before that, as I said above, we need consensus, and I know that there are a few people who don't want to see LilyPond go in this direction. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
