David Kastrup writes: >> We're missing consensus. I think that if there were a >> SponsorshipMeister, not unlike the BugMeister, we could do really cool >> stuff like this. Besides the monetary aid, this brings huge >> recognition to the community and gets a lot of people on board.
> A "SponsorshipMeister" is dangerously close to the premise that we can > turn money into LilyPond. The truth is that we can turn enthusiasm into > LilyPond. How to turn enthousiasm into LilyPond, if people are unaware of it's existence. Long before we go SponsorshipMeister, I would suggest a PRMeister. > We don't make the best of our potential for selling LilyPond out. But > we should not run into trap of making money a metric for the success of > LilyPond or its contributors. So what would be a valid metric for LilyPond's success? Can we determine where the hanging fruit is that we are missing in selling LilyPond out? Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
