On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > There are also a few advantages [of using MuseScore]: > > a) MusicXML export means the results are usable in a variety of notation > programs making use of an open standard.
Indeed, having MusicXML exprort can give Lily more popularity. > b) volunteers can be given a complete toolchain. "You can use an editor > of your choice" is about as helpful for the average musician as "You > can use a lathe of your choice". LOL :D how true! Valentin, that could be the next quote of the month :) > d) "I am well-versed in LilyPond. What form do you want the entry in? > Can I use music functions? What note language should I be using? > Should the voicing be reflected in ad-hoc voices? Should I be using > anonymous parallel voices? What kind of context mods should I be > using?" "Uh, we better form a committee for that kind of question." Good point. That's why our KickStarter project (at least the first one) should be a not-very-long piece for chamber orchestra. Or string quartet. Something with 3-6 staves and 5-15 pages. cheers, Janek PS there actually is one serious advantage of text input in a project like this: we could set up a git repository for it. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
