We'll think about this (and some more, when I'm back and we're ready with our current job ...). OK, Janek? Best Urs
"Janek Warchoł" <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> schrieb: >On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> There are also a few advantages [of using MuseScore]: >> >> a) MusicXML export means the results are usable in a variety of >notation >> programs making use of an open standard. > >Indeed, having MusicXML exprort can give Lily more popularity. > >> b) volunteers can be given a complete toolchain. "You can use an >editor >> of your choice" is about as helpful for the average musician as >"You >> can use a lathe of your choice". > >LOL :D >how true! Valentin, that could be the next quote of the month :) > >> d) "I am well-versed in LilyPond. What form do you want the entry >in? >> Can I use music functions? What note language should I be using? >> Should the voicing be reflected in ad-hoc voices? Should I be >using >> anonymous parallel voices? What kind of context mods should I be >> using?" "Uh, we better form a committee for that kind of >question." > >Good point. > >That's why our KickStarter project (at least the first one) should be >a not-very-long piece for chamber orchestra. Or string quartet. >Something with 3-6 staves and 5-15 pages. > >cheers, >Janek > >PS there actually is one serious advantage of text input in a project >like this: we could set up a git repository for it. > >_______________________________________________ >lilypond-user mailing list >lilypond-user@gnu.org >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
